684 N.W.2d 101
Supreme Court of South Dakota.
FISCAL YEAR 2004 (Fourth Quarter)
ABSTRACTS OF SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
Pursuant to SDCL 15-26A-87.1(A), (B), (C), and (D), the Supreme Court may, sua sponte, enter an order or memorandum opinion summarily affirming or reversing the judgment or order of the trial court in actions wherein the criteria as required by those sections are clearly met. SDCL 15-26A-87.1(E) provides that such summary dispositions may not be cited or relied upon as authority in any litigation in any court in South Dakota, except collateral estoppel, or in any criminal action or proceeding involving the same defendant or a disciplinary action or proceeding involving the same person.
Case Docket Date ofTitle Number Decision Disposition
J.G., In re ………………………… 22877 04/16/2004 Affirmed (JWD)
State v. Rodriquez…………………… 22938 05/03/2004 Affirmed (TLT)
State v. Danielson…………………… 22999 05/03/2004 Affirmed (DRG)
Zou v. Lin………………………….. 23025 05/03/2004 Affirmed (LSW)
Bontreger v. Human Services…………… 23006 05/03/2004 Affirmed (RKR)
Chavis v. Townsend…………………… 23036 05/03/2004 Affirmed (LSW)
C.S., In re…………………………. 23018 05/06/2004 Affirmed (TLT)
D.B.D., In re……………………….. 23037 05/21/2004 Affirmed (JAE)
State v. Benedict……………………. 22899 06/07/2004 Affirmed (JRVW)
State v. Rowland…………………….. 22970 06/07/2004 Affirmed (JWD)
State v. Rowland…………………….. 22971 06/07/2004 Affirmed (JWD)
State v. Rowland…………………….. 22972 06/07/2004 Affirmed (JWD)
Lee v. Lee………………………….. 22987 06/07/2004 Affirmed (BLM)
Terwilliger v. Terwilliger……………. 22988 06/07/2004 Affirmed (JMK)
Davis v. Evans………………………. 23012 06/07/2004 Affirmed (RJS)
State v. Flohr………………………. 23016 06/07/2004 Affirmed (MBT)
Page 102
BM, In re…………………………… 22868 06/15/2004 Affirmed (JWD)
JE, In re…………………………… 22962 06/15/2004 Affirmed (JWD)
Peterson v. Peterson…………………. 22594 06/15/2004 Affirmed (JSF)
Page 660