Supreme Court of South Dakota.
FISCAL YEAR 1999 (First Quarter) ABSTRACTS OF SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
Pursuant to SDCL 15-26A-87.1(A), (B), (C), and (D), the Supreme Court may, sua sponte, enter an order or memorandum opinion summarily affirming or reversing the judgment or order of the trial court in actions wherein the criteria as required by those section are clearly met. SDCL 15-26A-87.1(E) provides that such summary dispositions may not be cited or relied upon as authority in any litigation in any court in South Dakota, except when the decision establishes the law of the case, res judicata or collateral estoppel, or in any criminal action or proceeding involving the same defendant or a disciplinary action or proceeding involving the same person.
Case Docket Date ofTitle Number Decision Disposition
W.D., Matter of ………….. 20413 7/16/98 Affirmed S.P., Matter of ………….. 20346 7/16/98 Affirmed S.P., Matter of ………….. 20353 7/16/98 Affirmed State v. Stover ………….. 20255 9/21/98 Affirmed State v. Le ……………… 20339 9/21/98 Affirmed Renaudin v. Barcus ……….. 20373 9/21/98 Affirmed Estwick v. Estwick ……….. 20394 9/21/98 Affirmed State v. Flottmeyer ………. 20440 9/21/98 Affirmed Aberdeen, City of, v. Nyugen . 20446 9/21/98 Affirmed State v. Peterson ………… 20462 9/21/98 Affirmed Department of Social Services, ex rel. Hoffman v. Timperley ……………… 20487 9/21/98 Affirmed Werner v. Werner …………. 20383 9/21/98 Affirmed Hammrich v. Weber ………… 20351 9/21/98 Affirmed Pigott v. Pigott …………. 20273 9/21/98 Affirmed and Remanded Whitlock v. Whitlock ……… 20314 9/21/98 Affirmed Osloond v. Osloond ……….. 20328 9/21/98 Affirmed Kost v. Hertz ……………. 20348 9/21/98 Affirmed Hartman v. John Morrell
Co. …………………… 20380, 9/21/98 Affirmed 20397 Flinstones-Bedrock City v. City of Custer …………. 20381 9/21/98 Affirmed Robinson v. Lanoga Corp.[*] …………….. 20391 9/21/98 Affirmed Thompson v. Computer Solutions and Werner …………….. 20410 9/21/98 Affirmed
Page 819