Supreme Court of South Dakota.
FISCAL YEAR 1998 (Second Quarter) ABSTRACTS OF SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS
Pursuant to SDCL 15-26A-87.1(A), (B), (C), and (D), the Supreme Court may, sua sponte, enter an order or memorandum opinion summarily affirming or reversing the judgment or order of the trial court in actions wherein the criteria as required by those sections are clearly met. SDCL 15-26A-87.1(E) provides that such summary dispositions may not be cited or relied upon as authority in any litigation in any court in South Dakota, except when the decision establishes the law of the case, res judicata or collateral estoppel, or in any criminal action or proceeding involving the same defendant or a disciplinary action or proceeding involving the same person.
Case Docket Date ofTitle Number Decision Disposition
L.A.T., Matter of 19893 10/3/97 affirmed E.B., Matter of 19976, 10/28/97 affirmed 19977 State v. Fryer 19968 10/28/97 affirmed Kirkpatrick v. Bower 19982 10/28/97 affirmed State v. Blanton 19988 10/28/97 affirmed Hofer v. Terry Schulte Chevrolet 19991 10/28/97 affirmed Bjorke v. Bjorke 20002 10/28/97 affirmed State v. Pourier 20003 10/28/97 affirmed State v. Lesmeister 20006 10/28/97 affirmed Clark v. Crippled Children’s Hospital and School 20009 10/28/97 affirmed LaFromboise v. Durfee 20013 10/28/97 affirmed Baldeon v. Class 20034 10/28/97 affirmed Chapman v. Family Thrift Center 20040 10/28/97 affirmed N.T., Matter of 20049 10/31/97 affirmed State v. Egeberg 19889 12/8/97 affirmed State v. Brakke 19995 12/8/97 affirmed State v. Baltzer 20011 12/8/97 affirmed State v. Arguello 20042 12/8/97 affirmed Burge v. Minnesota Rubber 20053 12/8/97 affirmed State v. Barse 20068 12/8/97 affirmed State v. Hays 20086 12/8/97 affirmed J.P., Matter of 20108 12/17/97 affirmed V.E.A., Matter of 20163 12/17/97 affirmed L.A., Matter of 20171 12/17/97 affirmed Hoffman v. Tisher 20024, 12/17/97 affirmed 20136 State v. Engel 20058 12/18/97 affirmed Robinson v. Mike Lewis Construction 20075 12/18/97 affirmed
Page 457