ABSTRACTS OF SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS, 551 N.W.2d 23 (1996)


Supreme Court of South Dakota.
FISCAL YEAR 1996 (Fourth Quarter) ABSTRACTS OF SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

Pursuant to SDCL 15-26A-87.1(A), (B), (C), and (D), the Supreme Court may, sua sponte, enter an order or memorandum opinion summarily affirming or reversing the judgment or order of the trial court in actions wherein the criteria as required by those sections are clearly met. SDCL 15-26A-87.1(E) provides that such summary dispositions may not be cited or relied upon as authority in any litigation in any court in South Dakota, except when the decision establishes the law of the case, res judicata or collateral estoppel, or in any criminal action or proceeding involving the same defendant or a disciplinary action or proceeding involving the same person.

Case Docket Date ofTitle Number Decision Disposition
T.M., Matter of 19338 4/5/96 affirmed R.W., Matter of 19316 4/5/96 affirmed State v. Horse 19172 4/29/96 affirmed State v. Sierras 19259 4/29/96 affirmed State v. Martinez 19293 4/29/96 affirmed Reiners v. Reiners 19301 4/29/96 affirmed State v. Fitts 19311 4/29/96 affirmed State v. Moysis 19264 4/29/96 affirmed State of North Dakota ex rel. Grommesh v. Ries19320 4/29/96 affirmed In re Anderson, Estate of 19353 4/29/96 affirmed Plath v. Plath 19169 4/29/96 affirmed 19180 M.M., Matter of 19324 5/6/96 affirmed R.S., Matter of 19352 5/6/96 affirmed Grages v. Grages 19105 5/28/96 affirmed 19120 19121 Johnson v. Evenson 19396 5/28/96 affirmed State v. Irvin 19454 5/28/96 affirmed State v. Bringman 19397 5/28/96 affirmed State v. Bringman 19398 5/28/96 affirmed Casanova v. Casanova 19405 5/28/96 affirmed State v. Bu 19339 5/28/96 affirmed State v. Dahl 19418 5/28/96 affirmed Bies v. Norwest Bank v. Ekberg 19443 5/28/96 affirmed A J Transp., Inc. v. South Dakota Unemployment Ins. Div. 19270 5/28/96 affirmed Strong v. Mitzel 19448 6/28/96 affirmed

Page 298