Supreme Court of South Dakota.
FISCAL YEAR 1993 (Fourth Quarter) ABSTRACTS OF SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

Pursuant to SDCL 15-26A-87.1(A), (B), (C), and (D), the Supreme Court may, sua sponte, enter an order or memorandum opinion summarily affirming or reversing the judgment or order of the trial court in actions wherein the criteria as required by those sections are clearly met. SDCL 15-26A-87.1(E) provides that such summary dispositions may not be cited or relied upon as authority in any litigation in any court in South Dakota, except when the decision establishes the law of the case, res judicata or collateral estoppel, or in any criminal action or proceeding involving the same defendant or a disciplinary action or proceeding involving the same person.

Case Docket Date ofTitle Number Decision Disposition
State v. Barker ………………….18010 4/20/93 affirmed State v. Phyle …………………..18041 4/20/93 affirmed State v. Nelson ………………….18070 4/22/93 affirmed State v. Big Eagle ……………….18062 4/22/93 affirmed State v. Walks …………………..18063 4/22/93 affirmed State v. Jongeward ……………….17979 4/22/93 affirmed Younger v. Leapley ……………….18064 4/22/93 affirmed State v. Stevens …………………18132 5/26/93 affirmed People in Interest of D.W. ………..18038 5/26/93 affirmed People in Interest of H.M. ………..18071 5/26/93 affirmed State v. Briggs ………………….18040 5/26/93 affirmed State v. Horn ……………………18121 5/27/93 affirmed Ostby Family Trust v. Lawrence County ………………………..18177 5/27/93 affirmed State v. McMurray ………………..18073 5/27/93 affirmed Shape v. Shape …………………..18167 5/27/93 affirmed State v. Red Fox …………………18106 5/27/93 affirmed State v. Jenkins …………………18092 5/27/93 affirmed Dahl v. Sittner ………………….18024 6/1/93 affirmed 18037

Page 572