Supreme Court of South Dakota.
FISCAL YEAR 1993 (Third Quarter) ABSTRACTS OF SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

Pursuant to SDCL 15-26A-87.1(A), (B), (C), and (D), the Supreme Court may, sua sponte, enter an order or memorandum opinion summarily affirming or reversing the judgment or order of the trial court in actions wherein the criteria as required by those sections are clearly met. SDCL 15-26A-87.1(E) provides that such summary dispositions may not be cited or relied upon as authority in any litigation in any court in South Dakota, except when the decision establishes the law of the case, res judicata or collateral estoppel, or in any criminal action or proceeding involving the same defendant or a disciplinary action or proceeding involving the same person.

Docket Date ofTitle Number Decision Disposition
Katon v. Merklinger …………………… 17842 1/13/93 Affirmed Carver v. Heikkila ……………………. 17941 1/14/93 Affirmed Kilber v. Benson Quinn Elevator ………… 17945 1/14/93 Affirmed J.S., People in Interest of ……………. 17926 1/15/93 Affirmed A.W., People in Interest of ……………. 17845, 1/15/93 Affirmed 17862 State v. Huisenga …………………….. 17922 1/15/93 Affirmed Heckenlaible v. Heckenlaible …………… 17815, 1/15/93 Affirmed 17918 Hayden v. Hayden ……………………… 17929 1/15/93 Affirmed State v. Jones ……………………….. 17830 1/15/93 Affirmed Wentzel v. Maguire Iron ……………….. 17940 1/15/93 Affirmed State v. Rodden ………………………. 17971 1/15/93 Affirmed State ex rel. Stone v. Atwill ………….. 17957 2/10/93 Affirmed Cleveland v. City of Belle Fourche ……… 17973 2/10/93 Affirmed Pulse v. Continental Lumber Co. ………… 17976 2/10/93 Affirmed State v. Robinson …………………….. 17939 2/11/93 Affirmed State v. Walth ……………………….. 17956 2/11/93 Affirmed Larson v. Hill City and Custer Schools ……………………………. 17977 2/11/93 Affirmed A.M., People in Interest of ……………. 18006 3/22/93 Affirmed State v. Cane ………………………… 17943 3/22/93 Affirmed State v. Whiting ……………………… 17961 3/22/93 Affirmed

Page 357