Supreme Court of South Dakota.
FISCAL YEAR 1992 (Third Quarter) ABSTRACTS OF SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

Pursuant to SDCL 15-26A-87.1(A), (B), (C), and (D), the Supreme Court may, sua sponte, enter an order or memorandum opinion summarily affirming or reversing the judgment or order of the trial court in actions wherein the criteria as required by those sections are clearly met. SDCL 15-26A-87.1(E) provides that such summary dispositions may not be cited or relied upon as authority in any litigation in any court in South Dakota, except when the decision establishes the law of the case, res judicata or collateral estoppel, or in any criminal action or proceeding involving the same defendant or a disciplinary action or proceeding involving the same person.

Case Docket Date ofTitle Number Decision Disposition
State v. Weifenback …………………… 17590 1/15/92 Affirmed Braddock v. Leapley …………………… 17539 1/15/92 Affirmed People in Interest of V.B.B. …………… 17542 1/15/92 Affirmed Brandner v. Brandner ………………….. 17579 1/15/92 Affirmed Varnell v. Ihnen ……………………… 17599 1/16/92 Affirmed Auer v. St. Paul Property
Liability Ins. Co. ………………….. 17598 1/16/92 Affirmed State v. Sprowl ………………………. 17574 1/17/92 Affirmed State v. Schmidt ……………………… 17548 1/17/92 Affirmed D.C., Matter of ………………………. 17516 1/17/92 Affirmed Pred’s v. I.B. Diffusion ………………. 17587 2/12/92 Affirmed Bjerke v. Watertown Sch. Dist. …………. 17605 2/12/92 Affirmed State v. Cochrun ……………………… 17515 2/13/92 Affirmed Johnson v. S.D. Dept. of Labor …………. 17610 2/13/92 Affirmed State v. Bult ………………………… 17536 2/13/92 Affirmed State v. Morrison …………………….. 17575 2/14/92 Reversed Whiting v. Collins Siding Co. ………….. 17650 3/24/92 Affirmed State v. Manning ……………………… 17660 3/24/92 Affirmed Farmers Coop Oil v. Burger …………….. 17663 3/24/92 Affirmed Kaiser v. Bowdle Sch. Dist. ……………. 17674 3/24/92 Affirmed

Page 634