Supreme Court of South Dakota.
FISCAL YEAR 1990 (Fourth Quarter) ABSTRACTS OF SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

Pursuant to SDCL 15-26A-87.1(A), (B), (C), and (D), the Supreme Court may, sua sponte, enter an order or memorandum opinion summarily affirming or reversing the judgment or order of the trial court in actions wherein the criteria as required by those sections are clearly met. SDCL 15-26A-87.1(E) provides that such summary dispositions may not be cited or relied upon as authority in any litigation in any court in South Dakota, except when the decision establishes the law of the case, res judicata or collateral estoppel, or in any criminal action or proceeding involving the same defendant or a disciplinary action or proceeding involving the same person.

Case Docket Date ofTitle Number Decision Disposition
Tennyson v. City of Brookings ……… 16869 5/3/90 Affirmed City of Sioux Falls v. Johnson …….. 16865 5/3/90 Affirmed Mollet v. Mollet …………………. 16734 5/3/90 Affirmed Williams v. Williams ……………… 16834 5/7/90 Affirmed State v. Parkis ………………….. 16789 5/8/90 Aff/in part; Rev/in part State v. Herrin ………………….. 16852 5/8/90 Aff/in part; Rev/in part Masden v. Thomas …………………. 16891 5/8/90 Affirmed State v. Apple …………………… 16821 5/8/90 Affirmed Matter of J.J. …………………… 16714 5/8/90 16741 Deuel Co. Nat’l Bank v. Westphal …… 16905 5/17/90 Affirmed State v. Wanned ………………….. 16643 6/4/90 Affirmed Ashland v. Luisi …………………. 16862 6/4/90 Affirmed Brown v. Alumax Extrusions ………… 16873 6/4/90 Affirmed People in Interest of M.J.S. ………. 16863 6/4/90 Affirmed State v. Schultz …………………. 16931 6/4/90 Affirmed State v. Jackson …………………. 16886 6/4/90 Affirmed 16880 State v. Kelso …………………… 16878 6/4/90 Affirmed State v. Pesicka …………………. 16898 6/4/90 Affirmed People in Interest of M.J.H. ………. 16844 6/4/90 Affirmed State v. Troll …………………… 16803 6/8/90 Affirmed

Page 132