Supreme Court of South Dakota.
FISCAL YEAR 1990 (Second Quarter) ABSTRACTS OF SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

Pursuant to SDCL 15-26A-87.1(A), (B), (C), and (D), the Supreme Court may, sua sponte, enter an order or memorandum opinion summarily affirming or reversing the judgment or order of the trial court in actions wherein the criteria as required by those sections are clearly met. SDCL 15-26A-87.1(E) provides that such summary dispositions may not be cited or relied upon as authority in any litigation in any court in South Dakota, except when the decision establishes the law of the case, res judicata or collateral estoppel, or in any criminal action or proceeding involving the same defendant or a disciplinary action or proceeding involving the same person.

Case Docket Date ofTitle Number Decision Disposition
Black Hills Baloons v. Department of Revenue ………………………….. 16593 10/25/89 Reversed State v. Rindahl ………………………. 16584 10/25/89 Affirmed State v. Zwetzig ………………………. 16635 10/25/89 Affirmed State v. Griffee ………………………. 16544 10/25/89 Affirmed State v. Gotzmer ………………………. 16547 10/25/89 Affirmed Truax v. Safeway Stores, Inc. …………… 16515 10/25/89 Affirmed Fetherhuff v. Fetherhuff ……………….. 16408 10/25/89 Affirmed Howie v. Howie ………………………… 16611 10/25/89 Affirmed Scherr v. Cleary ………………………. 16573 10/25/89 Affirmed State v. Valdez ……………………….. 16648 10/25/89 Affirmed Dale v. Utter …………………………. 16590 10/25/89 Affirmed Burggraaff v. Sougstad …………………. 16563 12/5/89 Affirmed Oster v. Oster ………………………… 16599 12/5/89 Affirmed Van Laar v. Solem ……………………… 16604 12/5/89 Affirmed Winters v. Solem ………………………. 16607 12/5/89 Affirmed Holz v. S.D. Dept. of Labor …………….. 16633 12/5/89 Affirmed State v. Black Tail Deer ……………….. 16664 12/5/89 Affirmed State v. O’Brien ………………………. 16684 12/5/89 Affirmed D.K., Matter of ……………………….. 16706 12/5/89 Affirmed People in Interest of H.H.P. ……………. 16666 12/5/89 Affirmed State v. Olpherts-Forrester …………….. 16646 12/5/89 Affirmed State v. Allen ………………………… 16588 12/5/89 Affirmed

Page 1