Supreme Court of South Dakota.
FISCAL YEAR 1990 (First Quarter) ABSTRACTS OF SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

Pursuant to SDCL 15-26A-87.1(A) and (B), the Supreme Court may, sua sponte, enter an order or memorandum opinion summarily affirming or reversing the judgment or order of the trial court in actions wherein the criteria as required by those sections are clearly met. SDCL 15-26A-87.1(C) provides that such summary dispositions may not be cited or relied upon as authority in any litigation in any court in South Dakota, except when the decision establishes the law of the case, res judicata or collateral estoppel, or in any criminal action or proceeding involving the same defendant or a disciplinary action or proceeding involving the same person.

Case Docket Date ofTitle Number Decision Disposition
Hunter v. Solem …………………… 16533 9/14/89 Affirmed Benson v. Solem …………………… 16506 9/14/89 Affirmed State v. Treloar ………………….. 16470 9/14/89 Affirmed State v. Ehrman …………………… 16568 9/14/89 Affirmed Marquardt v. Gen. Cas. Cos. ………… 16583 9/14/89 Affirmed State v. Lufkins ………………….. 16565, 9/14/89 Affirmed 16566 State v. Martin …………………… 16479 9/15/89 Affirmed State v. Eagle Horse ………………. 16452 9/15/89 Affirmed Wiese v. Wiese ……………………. 16559, 9/15/89 Affirmed 16548 Bates v. Dept. of Soc. Serv. ……….. 16557 9/15/89 Affirmed Rykhus v. Rykhus ………………….. 15438 9/20/89 Affirmed State v. Johnson ………………….. 16541 9/20/89 Affirmed Andrews v. Magnetic Peripherals …….. 16549 9/20/89 Reversed R.S., People in Interest of ………… 16534 9/20/89 Affirmed State v. Westberry ………………… 16601 9/20/89 Affirmed

Page 511