Supreme Court of South Dakota.
FISCAL YEAR 1987 (First Quarter) ABSTRACTS OF SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

Pursuant to SDCL 15-26A-87.1(D), summary dispositions of appeals filed in the South Dakota Supreme Court may not be cited or relied upon as authority in any litigation in any court in South Dakota except when the decision establishes the law of the case, res judicata or collateral estoppel, or in any criminal action or proceeding involving the same defendant or a disciplinary action or proceeding involving the same person.

Case Docket Date ofTitle Number Decision
State v. Schultz ………….. 15273 7/10/86 Kanaly v. State …………… 15249 7/28/86 State v. Davidson …………. 15323 7/28/86 Amdahl v. Sarges ………….. 15291 7/28/86 Peterson v. Safway Steel Scaffolds ……………….. 15340 7/28/86 Kohlman v. Veit …………… 15300 8/14/86 Lindley v. Lindley ………… 15293 8/14/86 State v. Aliberti …………. 15218 8/14/86 C.S., Matter of …………… 15316 8/14/86 H R Plumbing v. Johnson Controls ………………… 15360 8/14/86 State v. Couch ……………. 15109 8/19/86 State v. Peterson …………. 15375 8/28/86 State v. Phipps …………… 15349 8/28/86 T.A., Matter of …………… 15332 9/11/86 Lee v. Solem ……………… 15324 9/11/86 State v. Williams …………. 15155 9/23/86 State v. Mahoney ………….. 15164 9/23/86 Johnson v. Kolman …………. 15388 9/30/86 Nase v. Christensen ……….. 15397 9/30/86
CaseTitle Motion Disposition
State v. Schultz ……….. by appellee for affirmance denied Kanaly v. State ………… by appellee for affirmance denied State v. Davidson ………. by appellee for affirmance granted Amdahl v. Sarges ……….. by appellee for affirmance denied Peterson v. Safway Steel Scaffolds …………….. by appellees for affirmance denied Kohlman v. Veit ………… by appellee for affirmance denied Lindley v. Lindley ……… by appellee for affirmance denied State v. Aliberti ………. by appellee for affirmance denied C.S., Matter of ………… by appellee for affirmance denied H R Plumbing v. Johnson Controls ……………… by appellee for affirmance denied State v. Couch …………. Court Sua Sponte affirmed State v. Peterson ………. by appellee for affirmance denied State v. Phipps ………… by appellee for affirmance denied T.A., Matter of ………… by appellee for affirmance granted Lee v. Solem …………… by appellee for affirmance denied State v. Williams ………. Court Sua Sponte affirmed State v. Mahoney ……….. Court Sua Sponte affirmed Johnson v. Kolman ………. by appellee for affirmance denied Nase v. Christensen …….. by appellee for affirmance denied

Page 89