Supreme Court of South Dakota.
FISCAL YEAR 1985 (Third Quarter) ABSTRACTS OF SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

Pursuant to SDCL 15-26A-87.1(D), summary dispositions of appeals filed in the South Dakota Supreme Court may not be cited or relied upon as authority in any litigation in any court in South Dakota except when the decision establishes the law of the case, res judicata or collateral estoppel, or in any criminal action or proceeding involving the same defendant or a disciplinary action or proceeding involving the same person.

Case Docket Date of
Title Number Decision Motion Disposition
State v. Mouttet ……….. 14697 1/3/85 by Appellee for
affirmance denied
Bublitz v. McKellips ……. 14666 1/3/85 by Appellee for
affirmance denied
Petersen v. Petersen ……. 14711 1/8/85 by Appellee for
affirmance stricken[*]
Biteler v. Biteler ……… 14629 1/11/85 Court sua sponte reversed
N.W. Bell v. P.U.C. …….. 14723 1/16/85 by Appellee for
affirmance stricken[*]
Heinzman v. Howard ……… 14702 1/17/85 by Appellant for
reversal denied
People in Interest of A.M.L. 14731 1/31/85 by Appellee for
affirmance denied
White v. Solem …………. 14749, 1/31/85 by Appellee for
affirmance granted
14770
Varga v. Woods …………. 14675 2/14/85 by Appellee for
affirmance denied
Petersen v. Petersen ……. 14711 2/14/85 by Appellee for
affirmance granted
Hander Plumbing v.
Babinski …………….. 14718 2/14/85 by Appellee for
affirmance stricken[*]
Garritsen, Application of .. 14721 2/28/85 by Appellee for
affirmance denied
Fossum v. Fossum ……….. 14799, 2/28/85 by Appellee for
affirmance denied
14815
West v. Solem ………….. 14877 2/28/85 by Appellee for
affirmance granted
State v. Stewart ……….. 14759 2/28/85 by Appellee for
affirmance granted
Allied Collection Service v.
Miller ………………. 14703 3/14/85 by Appellee for
affirmance granted
Schwartz v. First Nat’l.
Bank in Sioux Falls …… 14832 3/28/85 by Appellee for
affirmance denied
Driver’s License Revocation
of Hopewell ………….. 14742 3/28/85 by Appellee for
affirmance denied
State v. Tolifson ………. 14811 3/28/85 by Appellee for
affirmance denied
[*] Motion for summary disposition was stricken for the reason that it did not state the ground or grounds upon which it was based, together with citation of authorities and record references to evidence relied upon.

Page 757