Supreme Court of South Dakota.
FISCAL YEAR 1984 (4th Quarter) ABSTRACTS OF SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS

Pursuant to SDCL 15-26A-87.1(D), summary dispositions of appeals filed in the South Dakota Supreme Court may not be cited or relied upon as authority in any litigation in any court in South Dakota except when the decision establishes the law of the case, res judicata or collateral estoppel, or in any criminal action or proceeding involving the same defendant or a disciplinary action or proceeding involving the same person.

Case Docket Date ofTitle Number Decision Motion Disposition
Cargill Inc. v. Elliott Farms ……….. 14430 4/10/84 affirmance denied Bruinsma v. Bruinsma …… 14341 4/23/84 Court Sua Sponte affirmed King v. King ………….. 14319 4/23/84 Court Sua Sponte affirmed State v. Bowling ………. 14367 4/23/84 Court Sua Sponte affirmed State v. Braun ………… 14102 4/25/84 Court Sua Sponte affirmed Nelson v. Palmquist ……. 14570 4/26/84 by appellee for affirmance stricken[1]
Connelly v. Connelly …… 14457 5/3/84 by appellee for affirmance denied Johnson v. Skelly Oil ….. 14440 5/3/84 by appellant for reversal denied 14466 Johnson v. Skelly Oil ….. 14446 5/3/84 by appellant for affirmance denied Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Mc Elvain …………… 14484 5/16/84 by appellee for affirmance denied Moulton v. State ………. 14506 5/16/84 by appellee for affirmance denied Baldwin v. Heinold Commodities …………. 14498 5/16/84 by appellee for affirmance denied Federal Land Bank v. Felt …………….. 14467 5/21/84 by appellant for reversal stricken[1]
Halverson v. State …….. 14479 5/25/84 Court Sua Sponte affirmed Simpson v. Conservative Mortg. Co. ………….. 14429 6/15/84 by appellee for affirmance denied Miners Merchants Bk. v. Braden Forestry ……… 14531 6/15/84 by appellee for affirmance denied State v. Uhrig ………… 14503 6/15/84 by appellee for affirmance granted Groseclose v. Bloom ……. 14460 6/15/84 by appellant for reversal denied Kluck v. Kluck ………… 14535 6/29/84 by appellee for affirmance denied Schuster v. Woodmen Acc. Life ……………… 14541 6/29/84 by appellee for affirmance denied

[1] Motion for summary disposition was stricken for the reason that it did not state the ground or grounds upon which it was based, together with citation of authorities and record references to evidence relied upon.

Page 637